Re: Extensibility of draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules

[Alan DeKok <aland@nitros9.org>]

David B. Nelson wrote:
>>   Is it time to allow sub-attributes?
> 
> That's exactly what the proposed Extended Attributes work provides.  One
> level of nesting for sub-attributes.

  I thought I had seen it at one point, but that doesn't stand out in a
quick check of the current draft.

>> I will not that the guidelines document also has them as not 
>> recommended.
> 
> For RADIUS "Classic", that's correct.

  The guidelines document should probably say it's OK for RADEXT to do
it. :)

..
> BTW, I think we have completed the consensus call on that document, but I
> don't remember if I saw the official result announced.

  I didn't see a call on the list to make the extended attributes
document a WG item.  There wasn't any objections at IETF 69, though.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>