RE: Extensibility of draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

..[gwz] .
> BTW, I think we have completed the consensus call on that document, but I
> don't remember if I saw the official result announced.

  I didn't see a call on the list to make the extended attributes
document a WG item. 
[gwz] 
[gwz] That happened some time ago -- in fact, I think you even responded
positively ;-)
[gwz]
There wasn't any objections at IETF 69, though.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>