[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

To: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
From: "David B. Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:58:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <BAY117-DS154D4BF5B19166015FF82935B0@phx.gbl>
References: <003401c83a92$db6ed850$924c88f0$@net> <47729084.8060206@nitros9.org> <BAY117-DS154D4BF5B19166015FF82935B0@phx.gbl>

Bernard Aboba writes...
 
> >  WiMAX uses the same attribute format as proposed here.  Changes that
> > are incompatible with WiMAX should be discouraged.
> 
> I would agree.   If the extensions remain compatible with WiMAX then
> the amount of code duplication will be minimized.

I'm not so sure that I agree.  We should do what's right for the RADIUS
community.  If that happens to be compatible with WiMAX, then great.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@nitros9.org>
- Re: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
  - From: <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
Next by Date: Re: Comments on "practical deployments"
Previous by thread: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
Next by thread: Question on the Class attribute
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread