Re: [RRG] Mobility in the future -- civil aviation mobility

[Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com>]

On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Fleischman, Eric wrote:

> I disagree with your final paragraph: VPN aggregations are definitely
> still on the table within elements of our community. However, RRG  
> may --
> or may not -- choose to consider that issue as we see fit.

We're all quite familiar with the use of VPNs in many contexts,  
thanks.  The initial post in this sub-thread seemed to imply that  
large numbers of aerially-mobile nodes would have their traffic  
aggregated together within some sort of tunnel, to wit:

>While considering these issues, I have formed the tentative opinion  
that
>unanticipated requirements such as VPN-hosted communications radically
>change mobility considerations.

I disagree with the statement that VPN-hosted communications are  
unanticipated, and I further disagree with the statement that they  
radically change mobility considerations for this WG.  VPNs will be  
used in some instances, they won't be in others; irrespective of  
their use or non-use in any given circumstance, I don't believe  
there's any significance for this WG.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> // 408.527.6376 voice

	Culture eats strategy for breakfast.

           -- Ford Motor Company



--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg