[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)

To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
Subject: Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:25:41 +1300
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AipQB542ii7VbUDx9fCg7y6kO/Z29InsuAMigOGfWGyWSSDYlAQxI9rCSVUJpVCDYIjnjd32VdszUZHEfIOqpRyhY+W9aAkJu+rubSbzy5vWSWaJrEPYVEXDpqidbanzszq96erPpBBBbsLfkoA+OqLP4RGzjwLb/VcJudhH6YQ=
In-reply-to: <479E096A.4010001@ca.afilias.info>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <47956B71.2090609@firstpr.com.au> <57573EC5-D976-4132-B8BB-2E3273811806@cisco.com> <47969864.2050408@firstpr.com.au> <479748DB.6070206@cisco.com> <47978517.9080301@gmail.com> <C8732908-992A-4493-A1BA-CA9241DF2577@cisco.com> <4797BB91.9070300@ca.afilias.info> <85F9ABC0-6AEE-4E2E-8092-57D008BF6780@muada.com> <479E096A.4010001@ca.afilias.info>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)


> The idea is to make *less* work by splitting the problem space in two.

How does that apply in the case of a site that changes from single
homed to dual homed to triple homed and back again? I expect this
will be a very common occurrence.

   Brian

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>

References:
- [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
- Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
- Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Tunnel fragmentation/reassembly for RRG map-and-encaps architectures
Next by Date: Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
Previous by thread: Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
Next by thread: Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread