[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification



% Just to clarify: do you mean that "fix naming" is not in any
% of the branches mentioned in my msg?

Yes.

% Here is my personal view:
% - naming on Internet is a very important issue.

Agree.

% - it is also very broad, concerning multiple layers of the
%   protocol stack.

That claim is not necessarily true.

% - there are inter-dependencies between naming at diff layers.

At present, this is often the case, but is not always the case.
It is not necessarily true going forwards.

% - In solving the routing scalability problem,
%   we need a clear understanding of, as far as naming is concerned,
%   (a) what we depend on the lower layers
%    (b) what we may affect on the higher layers

I can't follow the above.

% - It is beyond our charter to offer a solution for the
%    naming problem across all the layers of the protocol stack.

That is not obvious from a plain reading of the current charter.

In any event, there are architectural concepts that might be applied
that would not require ALL layers of naming to change.

% - IP/routing layer solution should focus on our own problem at hand,
%   once we make the design decision here, we'd be in much better
%   position to handle upper layer naming issues.

The defined problemS in the charter, all of which are in scope,
go beyond site multi-homing to explicitly include other things
(e.g. mobility).

ALL of the problems in the RG charter need to be addressed,
not just the site multi-homing issue.

As an example, reading IEN-1 might suggest that modifying the sundry
transport-protocols to not include location information in the pseudo-header
is  one possible solution approach.  (It might or might not be the
*preferred* approach, but that is a separate question.)  That approach
is neither translation, nor map-and-encap, nor ....

Yours,

Ran
rja@extremenetworks.com


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg