[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension

To: "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:22:40 -0700
Cc: "'Robin Whittle'" <rw@firstpr.com.au>, "'Routing Research Group'" <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <48B1E975.3010501@gmail.com>
References: <20080823005214.D62B76BE550@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <BD84E07C99C14EC99764D0560442146A@ad.redback.com> <48AF7374.8020701@firstpr.com.au> <5036DDFA80DE497FBB6DA8166FFC94CB@ad.redback.com> <48B1E975.3010501@gmail.com>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>

 

|The reasoning is that IPv6 was designed that way, so why not
|use the feature if it proves to be useful, at least for small/medium
|sites.


Do folks really feel that stateless autoconfig is a significant step forward
vs. DHCP?  Current dual-stack site admins would be especially welcome to
opine.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Bruce Curtis <bruce.curtis@ndsu.edu>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>

References:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread