[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension

To: tony.li@tony.li
Subject: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:04:54 -0500
Cc: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Robin Whittle' <rw@firstpr.com.au>, 'Routing Research Group' <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <3345422EA9314918A17F7FDCEA77D387@ad.redback.com>
References: <20080823005214.D62B76BE550@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <BD84E07C99C14EC99764D0560442146A@ad.redback.com> <48AF7374.8020701@firstpr.com.au> <5036DDFA80DE497FBB6DA8166FFC94CB@ad.redback.com> <48B1E975.3010501@gmail.com> <3345422EA9314918A17F7FDCEA77D387@ad.redback.com>


On Aug 24, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Tony Li wrote:

Do folks really feel that stateless autoconfig is a significantstep forwardvs. DHCP? Current dual-stack site admins would be especiallywelcome to
opine.


Not really.  We've been viewing it as a placeholder
until DHCPv6 clients get deployed further.  (Vista
ships with one today).

The unmanagedness of SLAAC is distasteful to enterprise
network admins (and RFC3041 further irritates them).

Cheers,

Dale
AS59 & AS2381


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread