[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension

To: "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:28:24 -0700
Cc: "'Christopher Morrow'" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, "'Robin Whittle'" <rw@firstpr.com.au>, "'Routing Research Group'" <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <48B35969.9040901@gmail.com>
References: <20080823005214.D62B76BE550@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <BD84E07C99C14EC99764D0560442146A@ad.redback.com> <48AF7374.8020701@firstpr.com.au> <5036DDFA80DE497FBB6DA8166FFC94CB@ad.redback.com> <48B1E975.3010501@gmail.com> <3345422EA9314918A17F7FDCEA77D387@ad.redback.com> <75cb24520808251428n69c5698ah3810ce39640d76d7@mail.gmail.com> <48B33397.1020909@gmail.com> <47F136BDFFF14C57A92625172EE36F69@ad.redback.com> <48B35969.9040901@gmail.com>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>

 

|But I think the reason is not specific to stateless-autoconf or DHCPv6.
|In my mind it's because v6 prefixes will never be in desperately
|short supply, so the normal model is add/deprecate/drop rather than
|replace. That's the point of RFC 4192.


Hmmm... Ok, to my mind that only addresses one small part of the pain.  ;-)

If we have an architectural solution then we're renumbering identifier
prefixes then those shouldn't be 'hard' to get either.  

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread