[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension

To: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:30:42 -0700
Cc: "Routing Research Group" <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <A300C5D5-C608-4FBB-BDB5-75212FB71D21@muada.com>
References: <20080823005214.D62B76BE550@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <BD84E07C99C14EC99764D0560442146A@ad.redback.com> <48AF7374.8020701@firstpr.com.au> <5036DDFA80DE497FBB6DA8166FFC94CB@ad.redback.com> <48B1E975.3010501@gmail.com> <3345422EA9314918A17F7FDCEA77D387@ad.redback.com> <75cb24520808251428n69c5698ah3810ce39640d76d7@mail.gmail.com> <48B33397.1020909@gmail.com> <A300C5D5-C608-4FBB-BDB5-75212FB71D21@muada.com>

Iljitsch,
 
>it's a large amount of traffic at the same time. Worse, this is  
>multicast traffic, which is very bad for wireless networks. (Although  
>hacks should be possible to reduce this.)

DHCPv6 relays can be provisioned with the unicast addresses
of servers, and clients can contact relays via link-local
multicast. So, it is not necessarily true that there will
always be undesireable levels of multicast traffic when
the correct configurations are used (no hacks required).

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

References:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread