Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

[Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org]

On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:44:28 +0100, Tim Chown wrote:

> Between networks the "enough IPv4 addresses that we can build parallel
> networks everywhere" argument works, for the ISP systems.  In end user 
> or customer systems, I would expect we'll see a lot of dual stack that 
> is IPv4+NAT alongside global IPv6.    From the ISP perspective what they
> might see now is a handul of users achieving that by using a tunnel broker
> (probably not one run by the ISP itself) and the challenge is offering 
> (native, dual-stack) IPv6 from the ISP infrastructure directly.

I fully agree with this. I was not suggesting to hand out more IPv4
addresses. I was suggesting to hand out more IPv6 addresses and give
them them native IPv6 access instead of tunneled access.

	rvdp