[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compose using message-mail?
- To: wl-en@lists.airs.net
- Subject: Re: Compose using message-mail?
- From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <h.skuhra@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:17:28 +0100
- Delivered-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=OniEGBJz+Yeu2Y3P5hGslWqlTGkU3Cbm/ZwS/0kSUTA=; b=hnQjZY9Z3q2X2+78fZ6YrpghhbR8JKHsxidjQHlacaPPJ2RmMXlWmwY7dtpbtoWCnO Pg/34aiMvSsN8wwv5UgZievemTAG/gyUiBDLRuQTJsNDfM4I8zV+gUHoKkQV0ruo+WTk UayrhTmkQoOvNTte4QDbVgwMJ+3ffxFSinKfk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; b=Mqo6xLLg00HFJsT64s6+OmfQiqy3jTA09Gj36uLt700O4IBGLBQ6R/euUP+ZPJmv2X K1PlLqeHv2BW3gpOao7xkr5nplc1qTzbR+GBrIvaBquZVWxqDYCPQAy1HvVbgx6E+GpB Q/grx8YgZ6Zc5XtVO3p1G0MDibFh4F8yCrxNQ=
- In-reply-to: <m2vdfgjpa4.fsf@boostpro.com>
- List-help: <mailto:wl-en-ctl@lists.airs.net?body=help>
- List-id: wl-en.lists.airs.net
- List-owner: <mailto:wl-en-admin@lists.airs.net>
- List-post: <mailto:wl-en@lists.airs.net>
- List-software: fml [fml stable 20011102.2100]
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:wl-en-ctl@lists.airs.net?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <m2vdfgjpa4.fsf@boostpro.com>
- Reply-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.8 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1.91 (i386-pc-freebsd8.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
At Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:00:03 -0500,
David Abrahams wrote:
>
>
> Why does WL have its own composition mode? I find it problematic:
>
> 0. Duplicated functionality has a high maintenance cost
> 1. I'm not used to the keybindings (solvable)
> 2. It has a highlighting bug
>
> The specific highlighting bug is that if I put the cursor in the middle
> of a cited line, e.g.
>
> > foo bar baz
> ^--- here
>
> hit return, and start typing (as I often do when I need to respond to
> specific points in a post), the new text gets highlighted as though it
> was part of the citation, even though its lines don't start with `>'.
That's why I have turned off body highlighting in the draft buffer:
(setq wl-highlight-body-too nil)
-Herbert