Re: Use of wl-summary-auto-sync-marks

[Erik Hetzner <egh@e6h.org>]

At Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:56:56 +0200,
David Maus wrote:
>
> > > At Tue, 10 May 2011 23:05:30 -0700,
> > > Erik Hetzner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody have any thoughts? I am not too certain about what
> > > > syncing marks does, or rather when it is necessary, so comments are
> > > > appreciated.
> 
> I'm okay with this modification. If persistent flags (e.g. unread,
> important, user defined keywords) don't matter, syncing them is not
> necessary and if it get's in your way, you should be able to disable
> syncing in this particular case (e.g.: folder).
> 
> Not sure how you could actually lose flags unless the client pushes
> it's perspective to the server which AFAIK only happens if you toggle
> a flag (or do something that toggles a flag).
> 
> If there are no objections, I'd like to push the patch to CVS trunk
> end of July 2011.

Hi David,

Should the issues raised here:

  http://mid.gmane.org/87vcw4ki1c.wl%25matt@dancingfrog.co.uk

be addressed first? I can’t really think of a reason why, but I’m
reluctant to make changes that may turn out to be unnecessary later
if the mark synchronization functionality needs to be changed.

best, Erik

Sent from my free software system <http://fsf.org/>.