Re: wl-fcc vs encrypted mails

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> I've never used anything other emacs mua than Wanderlust and would be
> curious as to your evaluation of the pros and cons of each, beyond
> just encryption considerations.

the one thing i still, six years later, really miss from vm is being
able to edit a received message.  often it is only for formatting.
sometimes it is to correct a header error, such as an email addy.

> Myself, I was looking for good IMAP support and it seemed Wanderlust
> had the edge there.

that was it for me too.

randy, who is still trying to sort out mimed signing

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSLnb9AAoJEMzMBey4OgLtYP0H/A4O3O845q8RYdMpHYOwcozY
wDTBCPle7D5ytI1gYz2JeT6b36O8gThe5NwN6ehIdDx+C4i83NliJfuEA4Hwglr8
MnSbz7FU7xd/khp4bRXGM79WGCWAAOTHBgr/81WQr5F2+FETBl4K69qQ5v4TT6mc
c9EMExCHXos+d5lR3vp/cmCO2gztXiSFIFCc4/px11JRHrTDmjqzugJqM7lRI9I8
6DxBaDcMpQtDP+h97gwtoVdJKmSIPftu3SYnnPf3ALxdgnDe/E3ugCPJSrLD02+h
phy22PbJoeZP6MEbgD758CHCoEM9ybrwAHh9uQp8LwwZiVLKhuHDZGzaCOeM+HQ=
=Zy4i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----