Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

On Tuesday, Mar 11, 2003, at 09:03 America/Montreal, Tim Chown wrote:
> What is required to break the impasse of no progress within the IETF on
> multi6?
I'm not *recommending* this, but any action/inaction on the part of the 
IESG,
including the ADs for this WG, is appealable provided that one follows
the formal appeals process.

Frankly, I think the ADs and WG Chairs for multi6 are well across the 
line,
outside the boundaries of civilised behaviour to not even permit an 
active WG
with active on-charter list discussions to meet to discuss items listed 
in an
IESG-approved WG charter.  This is particularly true since it is not a 
one-time
occurrance, but a repeated behaviour on their part.

Yours,

Ran
rja@extremenetworks.com