[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard

To: curtis@fictitious.org
Subject: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
From: Engin Gunduz <engin@ripe.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:08:04 +0200
Cc: Mark Prior <mrp@mrp.net>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, iesg@ietf.org, rpslng@ripe.net, rps@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200309230212.h8N2Bx6Z022900@mail.avici.com>
References: <3F6F85FE.1020302@mrp.net> <200309230212.h8N2Bx6Z022900@mail.avici.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On 2003-09-22 22:12:09 -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
[...]
> 
> I'm waiting to hear if implementors think that returning an import in
> place of an mp-import (etc) to an RPSL-only client will be difficult
> or whether it doesn't sound so hard after thinking about it.

The whois "protocol" does not allow the server to know if the client
is RPSL-only or not.  Changing the protocol to accomplish it is I think
out of scope.  CRISP will be the solution to this problem.
-engin


> 
> Curtis

-- 
Engin Gunduz
RIPE NCC Database Group

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Mark Prior <mrp@mrp.net>
- Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@laptoy770.fictitious.org>

References:
- Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@laptoy770.fictitious.org>

Prev by Date: Re: comments on WG rechartering procedures
Next by Date: Reference Holds
Previous by thread: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread