Re: [ipv6-wg@ripe.net] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

[Robert Martin-Legène <robert@martin-legene.dk>]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 09:59:51PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Well, two weeks down the road and things got even worse:
> 
> NS list summary for ip6.int. from parent (int.) servers
>   == flag.ep.net. ns3.nic.fr. y.ip6.int.
>   == z.ip6.int.
> 
> $ dig @flag.ep.net. int. SOA +norec | fgrep status:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 9740
> $ dig @ns3.nic.fr int. SOA +norec | fgrep status:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 334
> $ dig @y.ip6.int int. SOA +norec | fgrep status:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 17872
> $ dig @z.ip6.int int. SOA +norec
> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
> 
> So we have 3 out of 4 servers totally broken.
> 
> Looks like the importance of ip6.int is way overstated by some folks.

Shouldn't you be asking these servers for ip6.int instead of asking them
for int.? Either way, I seem to be getting the same results.

For int. itself, it seems that only ns.isi.edu is not authoritative.

-- Robert Martin-Legène