[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-06.txt



On 2007-03-27 19:21, james woodyatt wrote:
On Mar 26, 2007, at 23:42, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

As a co-author (and of course I was recused in the IESG discussion) my main concern is to see the RFC published ASAP. [...]

As a member of the community who will have to live with the text of this RFC until it can be obsoleted by future revisions, I'd like to suggest that the co-author's desires to see the document published as quickly as possible should be secondary to concerns from the working group that the RFC not be misleading.

I don't believe the new title is misleading. If you read Cullen Jenning's
original DISCUSS comment, he felt strongly that the old title was
misleading.

    Brian