On Mar 27, 2007, at 7:21 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
On Mar 26, 2007, at 23:42, Brian E Carpenter wrote:As a co-author (and of course I was recused in the IESG discussion) my main concern is to see the RFC published ASAP. [...]As a member of the community who will have to live with the text of this RFC until it can be obsoleted by future revisions, I'd like to suggest that the co-author's desires to see the document published as quickly as possible should be secondary to concerns from the working group that the RFC not be misleading.
Do you feel that the document is misleading? That is something I have not heard the working group say.
Keep talking...?