Scott Brim wrote:
Historically that's usually what's happened when we explored this kind of distinction, in any area. In the end it just wasn't worth it and we reverted to a single general class. There was a time when we considered special ASNs for multihomed sites. What happened to that idea?
I think you are thinking of single-homed sites with "special" ASNs.Those are "private" ASNs >65000 (reserved range), and those are in use today. They get removed by the upstream, and are not seen outside of the upstream's AS.
The RFCs and code from multiple vendors supports this.So, thank you for providing an example where special cases *do* work, and do work well. :-)
Brian Dickson -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg