[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feedback on proposed charter from the IESG

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, EricLKlein wrote: 
2. Keep current items, and make new items fit stricter acceptance process
(active middle approach proposed by Eric)

No problem there, but the key point remains -- what would be that stricter acceptance process? :)

3. Keep current items, and specify that adding new work items requires
re-chartering (middle approach proposed by Pekka)
4. Keep Current items and re-charter as new issues come up (Sleep mode as
proposed by Alain)

I think these are basically the same. If there are no new items after done with those currently being chartered (and we still would need to discuss which those would be), the WG either goes to sleep or is shut down.. we don't have to decide which at this point.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings